[Bruce West]

Thanks Tony for clearing things up! I’m not surprised that the Clamhil hub went, I’m told they were worse than the Triumph version, which was about as good as a barely inflated tyre !!

[Bruce West]

I’m afraid I didn’t notice anything unusual about the rear end. It definately had full-width front hub, dowty forks, & what seemed to be the standard full-width hub on the back wheel. I just thought it was a bog-standard Post-war Shipley at the time. Bruce[/b]

[Bruce West]

Thanks for the info, Roger,

I shall already be involved at the VMCC meeting on the Sunday. My problem is that my first wife does not share my interest in bikes, & in deference to this I have to ration my time to that which meets with domestic approval!
I certainly won’t get away with 3 days on the trot!!
((Got to work on this one, perhps she ought to visit family in Kent for a few days?— watch this space!!))

Bruce

[Bruce West]

Forgive me if it goes all wrong, these are “dark forces” the nature of which I have little nollidge. By pressing “Reply” I presume I’m replying to Roger Moss,

---

here goes!

Hi Roger, re. Beezumph, will you be on the track Fri. or Sat. or both?

P.S. See the old messageboard for earlier reply, & thanks for the explanation re. 4 bearing crank!!

Best regards,

Bruce

[Author]

Posts