Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,951 through 7,965 (of 8,054 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2 Inch Diameter Left Hand Exhaust ? #5219
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Thanks for those leads i’ll certainly give them a try. I thought I remeberted something on the old forum about some being made but maybe that hasn’t yet happened,

    Best Wishes,

    Paul

    in reply to: Webb forks #5211
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Roger asked for the following email thread (between him and Malcolm Webb) to be published in case it is of interest to others…… so I have pasted it below:

    Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:33 AM
    Subject: WEBB FORKS
    Roger
    No mystery about Webb forks, Norton and Velocette used them for racing so they were better than the rest in their day!
    I can’t tell you specifically about Scott ones since my Scott lost hers after the war in favour of the Dowty types (a fairly common conversion) but I have used similar medium weight Webbs on a Velo and heavy weight ones on my pre-war Norton so herewith a little information to be going on with until the Scott experts reply (as I am sure that they will).
    On the Norton and Velo type the damper is on the offside (kick start side) and the links threaded on the studs are on the other side.
    To adjust you first slacken off the adjustable damper and spindle lock nuts on the nearside and rotate the spindles with their square ends to take up the side play. The idea is to take out the side play but to leave the knurled washers just free to turn with your fingers. No specified torque settings I am afraid, just tighten the lock nuts so they are holding the links.
    If you have not ridden girder forks before, be prepared for the sensation that the whole thing is unravelling when you hit some rough road, you soon learn why we Brits copied the Germans immediatly after the war.
    One tip, when you are satisfied with your initial adjustment, I would clean the ends of the spindle threads and coat them with plastic gasket, then tighten the lock nuts. This secures the nuts without the removal problems that using Loctite can bring. Do not underestimate the ability of girder fork nuts to come loose, I had a very embarassing experience some years ago with my Matchless V twin after a 30 mile ride to the MOT tester, since then I have used the gasket cement dodge (works on Triumph rocker box caps as well!).
    I am sure that someone will give you more technical advice, but be assured, on a bike like the Scott you will find girders a little different at first, but will soon get used to them. Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Malc Webb

    Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 1:54 AM
    Subject: WEBB FORKS AGAIN
    Roger
    Re-reading my message, I may not have been totally clear.
    Sit on the bike facing the front, on the right hand side of the forks you have the fork adjuster and the fork links with plain holes (no threads) the nuts just tighten onto the ends (I would stick these with gasket cement as well).
    On the left hand side of the forks you have the spindles with the square ends, the fork links threaded onto the spindles and lock nuts. The knurled adjuster washers ( they should be knurled, some use plain ones) are between the links and the ends of the fork spindle holders.
    Hope this makes more sense!
    Regards
    Malcolm

    Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:12 AM
    Subject: WEBB FORKS
    Hi Roger
    Glad to be of help, sorry that I underestimated your experience level, sounds like you know exactly what you are in for from girder forks!
    I have recently had some E-Mail discussions with Roger Moss and he thinks like me that there is need for some basic information to be made easily available, not just the sort of advanced engineering that I imagine comprises the bulk of the “Technicalities” information.
    I had a look around to see if I could find a diagram of a pair of Webbs, I began to think that there was something in this idea of a conspiracy of silence but I eventually found the attached in a small paperback Norton book.
    These must be pretty much like yours (they are called “Norton” but are actually Webbs built to the Norton spec) the only difference is the checks springs connecting the links (an idea used by Ariel, Matchless and several others at the time).
    I am not an E-Mail expert, hope the compression leaves the page still legible, I am up to date with the Anti-virus which scans everything in and out so this attachment should not give you any nasties.
    All The Best
    Malcolm

    Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 1:05 AM
    Subject: Re: Webb forks
    Roger
    That made me think! In the end I made a quick trip out to the garage with a torch to study my 1929 Norton.
    I am pretty sure that the answer is that there are no knurled washers on the lower spindle.
    One thing I forgot to check is which type of fork damper arrangement you have.
    One type has a damper knob on the offside and just a friction disc on the nearside (square spindle end) this is the type shown in that Norton diagram.
    Another type which I had years ago on a Sunbeam had a plain link on the nearside with not even a friction disc.
    This type, I think had knurled washers on the rear link.
    The other type, like the heavyweight Webbs on my old Norton has a damper adjuster both sides with a “star”
    washer and strange shaped elongated plates which act as adjuster levers – these don’t have the knurled washers on the rear link.
    If a photo would help, I can drag the Norton out when I get back from work tomorrow afternoon (I work shifts and some weekends) and sort some pics out on the digital camera.
    Regards
    Malcolm

    Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 1:35 AM
    Subject: Re: Webb forks
    Roger
    I think I am with you now, this is definately the same set up as used on my old Norton. The idea is that you set up the bottom links in the same way as the top links with minimum side play and then the “star dampers” give you extra damping control.
    It is so long since I had set of these apart that I am working from memory (which might be confused by the fact that I have dismantled not just Webbs but Matchless and BSA girders which varied in important details).
    The eliptical plates (shaped a bit like a sycamore leaf?) have their own threads which, I think, are on the outside portion of the spindles. When you turn them they bear on the star washers which bear on a circular plate which then bears on a disc of friction material which in turn bears on the circular plate cast into the front fork spindle holder.
    From what I can see balancing on top of my ES2 shining the torch down between the wall and the side of the old Norton (she just had to be nose in at the back of the shed!) there are no knurled washers on the bottom set of links.
    Apologies, it has been a difficult day work-wise today (Sunday), I am on evenings tomorrow so I will try and drag the ES2 out of the way and try and get you photo of the old Norton forks.
    If it is any compensation, these star washer types are the luxury ones devised for racing. Nortons adopted this type when one of their stars refused to race with the old (Druid) type forks because he thought that they were dangerous!
    Regards
    Malcolm

    Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 12:57 PM
    Subject: WEBB FORKS – A PHOTO
    Roger
    I finally managed to get to the back of the shed with a camera!
    Attached is a shot of the offside bottom link. The eliptical shaped plate (?) can be screwed clockwise to put tension on the star washer. The other side is pretty much the same except that the nuts are tightened onto the link instead of onto the end of the spindle and the square ends of the spindle protrude from the nuts.
    I do remember that some forks that I have seen have two thin nuts on the nearside, the outer one acting as a locknut, mine has only one nut per spindle bearing onto the (threaded) link.
    Despite what I have already said, there are Knurled washers on the bottom link. These are on the rear (steering head end) spindle only, and sit between the fork casting and the long flat linking plate so they are hidden in this picture.
    These forks were put together about 45 years ago, presumably by the same chap who put the bike together for
    racing (and ground off the frame number!). The “knurled” washers aren’t actually knurled on this bike (if you get what I mean) and are smaller than original.
    I hope that it is all begining to make sense!
    Regards
    Malcolm

    Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 2:37 PM
    Subject: Re: Webb forks
    Roger
    Having had time to think and re-read your message, a couple of points before I shoot off to work.
    The adjustment at the back (steering head) bottom link is the same as for the top links using the knurled washers which I now have to admit DO live there. The rear part of the friction disc holder (the long flat plate) has no part in the sideplay adjustment – the rear hole should be big enough to allow it to slide over the tubular part of the side link.
    The function of that part is to act as an anchor against the twisting motion of the forks working against the star washer on the front part. On some bikes like my big Matchless the disc holder plate doesn’t even extend over the rear spindle, it is cut short and bolted to a boss on the fork tube.
    The eliptical adjuster at the front bears directly on the star washer, there is no lock nut as such.
    Regards
    Malcolm


    in reply to: 2 Inch Diameter Left Hand Exhaust ? #5218
    Deleted User
    Participant

    hi paul;
    i have had several sets of these pipes from Ken lack, he I believe has them made in batches from time to time,usually I call him up, and after awhile the pipes arrive! he certainly would know how to advise you

    in reply to: 2 Inch Diameter Left Hand Exhaust ? #5217
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Hi Paul, Have you tried Armour Motor Products in Bournemouth Their catalogue states that they will make pipes to any pattern,
    Roger Hulett/

    in reply to: Technicalities on CD ROM #5154
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Just some thoughts here gained in the light of my experience doing what must now be thought of as a pilot for this project. The ideas that have been put forward already are all good and I cheer the enthusiasm with which, in general, appears to exist.
    These are my opinions.

    The product should be a complete set of Yowls and not just Technicalities. My reasoning is that, for the amount of extra work required, it would be far better to have access to everything available rather than just the technical issues thought by the compiler/s to be useful. A complete history has to be better than an abridged version.

    The format for this project should be Adobe .pdf. It gives us the best of both worlds in so much as the representation of the original Yowl article can be displayed/printed as it was in the original and also fully searchable for text. This is achieved during the scanning process, and is one of the reasons it takes so long, by creating a text file that sits behind the scenes out of site and when searched highlights the appropriate page and word in the original Yowl format. There is also the question of free viewing software that is a bonus and also the fact that everyone else who has done this in the past has elected to use Adobe, which has to be a good sign.

    It would be almost impossible to farm out this work to a number of different people to produce a part each as the differences in scanning equipment and the various settings used in the software need to remain constant in order to produce a finished item that looked and behaved consistently.

    The costs are interesting. I am sure that the graft that goes into actually scanning and then indexing and then formatting the page numbers is going to be expensive and I suggest we ask the Morgan OC who did theirs (as we have proof that they can do a good job) and ask for a quote. As far as producing the CD’s is concerned then anyone who has access to a CD writer can run off CD’s for less than £1. The most significant saving is postage – a couple of CD’s v. Techs !

    Why should we do it? I have no doubt that, as time goes by, the number of users of this forum with increase and it will be the normal route through which new members are recruited. If we cannot supply this sort of information – and I would go much further over time with the addition of marque photos and the various books “available” by Messers Stephens, Clew and Underhill – people will not be convinced that we are serious.

    I would also like to see a spares listing on the web site.

    Anyway enough from me. I am truly sorry that I could not complete the project for reasons beyond my control but at least I can offer the benefit of the experience to others who will take up the torch.

    in reply to: List of Scott Odds & sodits available #5203
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Please delete the Birmingham oil tank from list as now sold.

    in reply to: Scott frame #5213
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Hi Andy,thanks for the reply.
    The PM isnt working and there is no email address given so if you have email could you send me a message to Regalmark3@yahoo.com
    thanks very much

    in reply to: Scott frame #5212
    Deleted User
    Participant

    🙄 😆 I may have what you need tryed to pm you but the link is not working . Iam not displaying my phone number so try getting hold of me another way ANDY 😀

    in reply to: Technicalities on CD ROM #5153
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Hi All

    Technicalities on to CD…..the saga continues…but with positive news….

    I have now obtained 3 quotes – and quite a few ” u must be joking mate”!!
    responses.

    Anyway the best (in terms of time and willingness) and the cheapest quote is £850 to scan plus upto £50 to Burn off 20 CDs ( the amount of memory might need 2 CDs).

    This is a local reliable studio/printer here in Stratford on Avon.

    The work would take about 4 weeks – with the info being saved in jpeg format.

    I did ask about Acrobat formatting but this is really a lot more complex and potentially up to 3x the jpeg cost – simply because of time to name each page – also the memory used is significantly more – sorry u teccys but I go all glassy eyed when the jargon goes beyond the basics!!

    Anyway if my Maths are right this works out at £45 plus VAT per CD or 20 off – but obviously the price cascades downwards the more copies are burned off.ie 40 CDs would cost £22.50 plus VAT and so on….

    The Club might decide to add aprofit margin – I am not sure how this works.

    If the club decides to go ahead I am happy to project manage the production.

    I suggest that the spares scheme is the access route – but this needs to be agreed with Gill Swan.

    If we can decide pronto then we should be OK for sales at the Sept Gathering.

    Just give me the word and I will pounce into action like an Olympic Judo competitor and pin this project to the floor!!!!!!!!!!

    Of course the photocopy route is also available as a stand alone solution – or in tandem with the CD.

    Over to u guys!!!

    Cheers

    Neil Levings

    PS am moving house next week – and so may not be contactable via the web for a few days – say 13-18th July

    Call my mobile 07769834040 or new land line 01789 298440 from 13th.

    in reply to: Webb forks #5210
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Hi Al, Thanks for the information. I have in fact done all this including new friction discs etc. What I would like to know is,what is the sequence of assembly?, on which side do the squared ended shafts go?,what is the sequence of adjustment?, what are the torque settings for the nuts?, how much movement should there be on the gnurled washers ? etc etc etc.
    Your advice will be most welcome.
    Roger Hulett
    PS There appears to be a certain mystique about Webb forks, I did write to Yowl about it once but my letter evoked no response !!! I think there is a Secret Society for Webb Fork Aficionados

    in reply to: Webb forks #5209
    Deleted User
    Participant

    hi roger;
    while not an expert on webb forks, I did rework the ones on my 29 flyer, basicly there is not alot to it, the blades must be straight, you can make a jig to do this, or send it to a specitaly firm, but if its bent you can probably see it , I aquired a new spring from ken lack, as well as new spindals and nuts, holes in the fork can be re-bushed if necessary, this is a straight forward job for anyone with a lathe, ( i have seen forks that already have bronze bushes, and ones with no bushes just steel on steel) in the worst
    senario, the spindal holes can be re bored and new larger dia. spindals made, the spindals are a pain to make due to the R/H and L/h threads!
    my fork was also missing links, and neck stem, which I was lucky to aquire
    from a friend over here in the usa, if your stem is damaged, Id recomend
    a specialty firm to fit a new one such as percival bros, and webb, or ken lack, or probably roger moss as well!

    in reply to: Birmingham Scotts side stands #5199
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Birmingham Side Stands

    Right I’ll have another go! 1/ were Birmingham Scotts ever fitted with side stands? 2/ What did they look like? 3/ How did they fit?
    4/ do any still exist? Derek Swetnam

    in reply to: TT Rep tank & oilpump for sale #5178
    Deleted User
    Participant

    £300

    in reply to: Re. my 1949 cylinder head #5130
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Hi John
    I had the same problem years ago.
    Possibly it was this experience that distorted my character!
    Just a note to say that if anyone is in dire trouble and does not have access to a local machine shop I have all the machinery to get the studs out
    I am not looking to make a career out of this job but will always try to go the extra mile to help a fellow owner in difficulties.
    Kind Regards
    Roger Moss

    in reply to: List of Scott Odds & sodits available #5202
    Deleted User
    Participant

    Please delete the Birmingham crankcase from the list as this is now sold.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,951 through 7,965 (of 8,054 total)